UAP legal professionals drops enchantment, gives contemporary proof – Sudans Publish
JUBA-The protection legal professionals representing UAP Insurance South Sudan, a subsidiary of Old Mutual Group, East Africa, on Wednesday dropped an enchantment and introduced contemporary proof earlier than the courtroom, claiming the agency had paid money as a settlement to dismissed employees.
In December 17, the presiding Judge Francis Amum granted protection advocate Mr. Gabriel Anyar extra time to resolve on his subsequent transfer after rejecting their authorized objection.
Addressing journalists after a courtroom session on Monday, Marko Reech – a plaintiff lawyer for axed UAP stated the UAP protection crew have determined to withdraw their enchantment and introduced counterclaim allegedly that the agency had settled dismissed employees.
“They came with something called counterclaim, in that claim, they are saying that the plaintiffs from those National Staff – took the money from them, so they are claiming that money also in the same case,” Reech stated.
Reech reaffirmed their readiness to answer to the protection lawyer’s declare within the courtroom session scheduled for December 20.
He stated the contemporary proof did give particulars of how a lot the agency had paid to former employees, including that they’d research the declare and reply.
“Actually, I’m going to pass through the paper, and I will make a clarification on it on Friday. I didn’t read the counterclaim fully – So it’s difficult for me now to disclose it,” he acknowledged.
He claimed that UAP Company is enjoying what he referred to as ‘delay tactic.’
“They [defense team] are now coming in with the new assumption again. That new assumption, we are going to look at it and we will continue. They are now using the tactic for delaying the case, I don’t think they have any evidence to prove their case,” he stated.
In September 2023, 57 nationwide employees of the UAP insurance coverage firm staged a strike over what they termed unfair working surroundings.
They accused the corporate of unequal cost in comparison with their overseas counterparts.
However, the corporate determined to sack the leaders of the nationwide employees affiliation, who later dragged it to courtroom.
